Navigate

Schools and Local Government

Page 3 of 5.

Middletown Proposes Land Swap With LLCs Linked to Mayor's Campaign Donors evidence image

Middletown Proposes Land Swap With LLCs Linked to Mayor's Campaign Donors

Middletown is considering a land swap involving township property and an $8 million payment to acquire 83 acres along Chapel Hill Road.

UPDATE, AUG. 31, 2026, 3 P.M.: After publication, Public Record NJ was contacted by a resident living on property involved in the proposed land swap. This story has been updated with their account of receiving notice to vacate the property.


The Middletown Township Committee is scheduled to hold a public hearing September 8 on a proposed land transaction that would exchange township-owned property and $8 million for 83 acres along Chapel Hill Road and Kings Highway East.1

The deal, introduced by ordinance on August 17, involves property owned by two LLCs formed in October 2024. Public business records reviewed for this article connect those LLCs through a shared registered agent and address to two companies that contributed to Mayor Tony Perry's 2024 reelection campaign the day after the LLCs were registered.

The proposed transaction also resembles a land swap described nearly three years earlier in a sworn certification filed in separate litigation against the township. In that certification, developer Seth Gerszberg alleged that Perry told him in August 2023 that he planned to make a deal in which the Montecalvo family would purchase the property and trade it to Middletown for township-owned land.2

The Township Committee introduced the ordinance without discussion. Full text of the ordinances is available in the Township public notices. Public comment and possible final action are scheduled for September 8 at 7 p.m.

Read more

Middletown BOE rejects LRFP major amendment after 5–4 vote; reconsideration attempt collapses in late procedural dispute evidence image

Middletown BOE rejects LRFP major amendment after 5–4 vote; reconsideration attempt collapses in late procedural dispute

The board voted 5–4 against an LRFP major amendment, then argued over procedure during an attempted reconsideration that ended with the original rejection left in place.

The Middletown Township Board of Education voted 5–4 Tuesday, April 28, against approving a “Long Range Facilities Plan (LRFP) Major Amendment Update,” then spent the end of the meeting arguing over whether — and how — that vote could be reconsidered.

In the end, the board president said the reconsideration would be withdrawn and that the original 5–4 rejection would stand.

On April 29, district leaders sent a post-meeting letter to the community — signed by Jessica Alfone and Chris Aveta — stating that, as a result of the board’s failure to adopt the LRFP, the district is now recommending holding off on the planned school closures and consolidations for the 2026–2027 school year.

Read more

Sherrill signs Executive Order 17 creating housing council, requiring state land inventory in New Jersey evidence image

Sherrill signs Executive Order 17 creating housing council, requiring state land inventory in New Jersey

Gov. Mikie Sherrill’s Executive Order 17 directs agencies to inventory state land for housing, creates an interagency council, and sets a 150-day deadline for recommendations.

Gov. Mikie Sherrill on April 27 signed Executive Order No. 17, directing New Jersey executive-branch entities to inventory state-controlled land and certain “unutilized,” “underutilized,” or “surplus” property that could be used for housing, and establishing a new interagency Housing Governing Council.

The order also adds a temporary procedural condition on property dispositions. Until an executive-branch department or agency has complied with the order’s reporting directives, it may not dispose of property it owns without approval from the Governor’s Office Chief Operating Officer (COO). The governing council must deliver its initial recommendations to the Governor’s Office within 150 days of the order taking effect.

Read more

Middletown BOE moves to dismiss school-closure challenge without addressing claims evidence image

Middletown BOE moves to dismiss school-closure challenge without addressing claims

The district argues a parents’ petition is premature under state rules, while continuing to advance a closure plan tied to the 2026–27 budget without responding to the underlying allegations.

The Middletown Township Board of Education is asking New Jersey’s Commissioner of Education to dismiss a parents’ petition challenging its February 26 school-closure vote, while declining to address the substance of the claims raised in that petition.

In a March 23 filing, the district does not defend the closure plan on its merits. Instead, it argues the case should be dismissed on procedural grounds, including that it is too early for the state to intervene because the formal approval process has not yet run its course.1

At the same time, the district continues to act on a timeline aligned with implementation. The February 26 vote directed the administration to proceed with a closure plan tied to the 2026–27 budget, and subsequent district activity has moved forward accordingly. The result is a dual posture: in court, the district argues the closures are not final; in practice, preparations continue as though they are.

Public Record NJ has obtained and reviewed the district’s letter brief to Commissioner of Education Lily Laux, submitted by Madden & Madden partner Regina M. Philipps in Kristin Rooney et al. v. Middletown Township Board of Education (Agency Ref. No. 079-03-26). The motion seeks dismissal “in its entirety” based on jurisdiction, ripeness, and failure to state a claim, and was filed in lieu of an answer.1

The parents’ petition challenging Middletown school closures, filed March 4 by Shah Law Group, LLC, asks the Commissioner to void the closure resolution and require the district to keep Leonardo Elementary School, Navesink Elementary School, and Bayshore Middle School open through the 2026–27 school year, among other relief.2

The district’s response centers on whether the case should move forward, rather than the claims it raises.

Read more