Navigate

Public Record NJ is an independent research project using verifiable public records to bring clarity, context, and accountability to New Jersey politics.

Campaign Finances · March 2, 2026
· 12:00 PM · 9 minutes read

ELEC Files Enforcement Complaints Against Holmdel GOP and Mayoral Candidate

ELEC filed two enforcement complaints alleging campaign-finance reporting and contribution-limit violations by Holmdel’s GOP committee and candidate Rocco Impreveduto; both matters are pending.

The New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission has filed two enforcement complaints tied to political fundraising and reporting in Holmdel—one naming Rocco Impreveduto, a municipal candidate, and his treasurer, and a second naming the Holmdel NJ Republican Committee and its organizational treasurer.

The filings matter because an ELEC enforcement complaint is a formal step in the agency’s enforcement process: it lays out proposed findings and legal conclusions, and it starts a case in which respondents can request a hearing before any final decision is issued.

The complaint against the Holmdel Republican Committee is the first enforcement complaint issued for the 2025 election cycle.

What ELEC filed

ELEC filed “Complaint and Notice of Enforcement Commission, Opportunity for a Hearing” matters against:

  • Rocco Impreveduto (candidate) and Joe Romano (treasurer).1
  • Holmdel NJ Republican Committee (a municipal political party committee) and Delia Fagan (organizational treasurer).2

Both notices state the complaints are brought under New Jersey’s Campaign Contributions and Expenditures Reporting Act and ELEC’s regulations, and that respondents are offered the opportunity for a hearing under the Administrative Procedure Act.12

Procedural posture: allegations, not final decisions

The Holmdel GOP notice states respondents may request a hearing in writing and may appear personally or by attorney. It also states that if respondents fail to file a written answer within 20 days of service, ELEC may enter a final decision, including a monetary penalty.3

The Impreveduto complaint likewise offers an opportunity for a hearing and frames penalties as something “should be imposed,” reflecting that the matter is not yet a final determination.1

Key allegations in the Impreveduto complaint (2024 primary and general elections)

ELEC’s complaint against Impreveduto and Romano covers reporting tied to the June 4, 2024 primary election and the November 5, 2024 general election in Holmdel Township.4

Figure 1. Count 1, Proposed Findings of Fact. Source: Complaint, New Jersey Election Law Commission v Rocco Impreveduto and Joe Romano.
Figure 1. Count 1, Proposed Findings of Fact. Source: Complaint, New Jersey Election Law Commission v Rocco Impreveduto and Joe Romano.

Primary election: alleged unreported contributions over the itemization threshold

In a count labeled “Failure to Report Contributions and Expenditures – Primary Election,” ELEC states the respondents filed Form A-1 on May 20, 2024, and alleges that the committee received contributions “in excess of $200” (aggregated by source) totaling $13,350 during the primary-election report period that had not been reported as of the complaint.4

Primary election: alleged failure to file 24-hour reports

In a separate count, ELEC alleges the respondents received 15 contributions totaling $12,400 on May 31, 2024, and did not file notice of those contributions.5

General election: alleged late Form A-1 and missing reporting

For the general election, the complaint states the respondents filed a Form A-1 on December 30, 2024, in a count titled “Late Filing of Form A-1 General Election.” This filing was 84 days late.6

In a separate general-election count, ELEC lists Form C-1 filings dated December 30, 2024 (one $500 contribution and 12 contributions totaling $12,050) and a later Form C-1 dated September 18, 2025 reporting one $4,800 contribution. ELEC also alleges no other contribution-and-expenditure reports were filed for the general-election period.7

The complaint further alleges that, “upon information and belief,” respondents received contributions totaling $29,050 and made expenditures totaling $24,350.91 during the general-election report period, and that contributions (including lump sums) had not been reported in full as of the complaint.7

Potential penalties described in the complaint

In the primary-election reporting count, the complaint cites statutory and regulatory provisions and states that penalties “may not be more than $9,800 for each reporting transaction” not reported or not filed on the required date.5

Key allegations in the Holmdel GOP complaint (2025 reporting and contribution limits)

ELEC’s complaint against the Holmdel NJ Republican Committee and Fagan concerns 2025 reporting obligations and contribution-limit rules for a municipal political party committee.8

What ELEC says the committee filed

In its proposed findings, the complaint states:

  • The committee filed Form D-3 on June 26, 2025 designating Fagan as organizational treasurer.8
  • The committee filed Form A-3 on January 3, 2025 certifying it would not spend more than $8,600 in calendar year 2025.8
  • The committee filed a 2025-Q2 Form R-3 on July 14, 2025 reporting $27,100 in contributions and $23,553.65 in expenditures.8
  • The committee filed a 2025-Q3 Form R-3 on October 13, 2025 reporting $6,900 in contributions and $12,214.03 in expenditures.8

Threshold: how A-3 relates to quarterly reporting

The complaint explains that under ELEC rules a committee may file Form A-3 certifying it does not expect to exceed $8,600 in expenditures in a calendar year. But it states that once expenditures exceed that threshold, the committee is required to file quarterly reports—specifically a Q2 report due July 15 and a Q3 report due October 15—reporting all contributions received and expenditures made for the applicable periods (including lump sums of small contributions).9

Contribution limits: two $10,000 contributions and a reported refund

In a contribution-limit count, the complaint states the respondents filed two Form C-3s: one on March 28, 2025 reporting a $10,000 contribution, and another on May 21, 2025 reporting a $10,000 contribution. ELEC alleges those two contributions were made by the same contributor. The complaint also states that the respondents reported a $4,800 refund dated August 5, 2025 to that contributor on the committee’s 2025-Q3 report.10

What New Jersey’s ELEC forms require

New Jersey’s campaign-finance system uses “threshold” filings for smaller campaigns and committees—but those sworn statements still carry reporting duties when certain triggers are met.

Candidate committees: A-1 does not eliminate all reporting

Form A-1 language states that if total spending “exceed[s] $5,800,” the committee is required to file Form R-1 on subsequent reporting dates. The same A-1 language states that contributions exceeding $200 “in the aggregate from one source” must be reported to ELEC on Form C-1 with identifying information about the source, including an individual contributor’s occupation and employer.11

Late-period reporting: 72-hour and 24-hour notices

Instructions for political party committee supplemental filings describe accelerated disclosure in the days before an election: once contributions exceed $300 in the aggregate from one source during the relevant pre-election window, committees must report within 72 hours and then within 24 hours as election day approaches.12

What records reviewed show

The documents reviewed for this story include copies of several ELEC filings referenced in the complaints.

For the Holmdel GOP committee, the record set includes the committee’s Q2, Q3, and Q4 Form R-3 filings for 2025, each showing totals consistent with those cited in ELEC’s complaint narrative.13

For Impreveduto’s committee, the record set includes committee organization filings (Form D-1) and multiple filings under the R-1 reporting system for the 2024 primary.14

What happens next

The Holmdel GOP complaint’s notice sets out the next procedural step: a written answer is due within 20 days of service if respondents want to contest the matter, and a hearing must be requested in writing. The notice states that if no written answer is filed, ELEC may enter a final decision, including a monetary penalty.3

Context: why campaign-finance deadlines matter

Campaign-finance reporting rules are designed to give voters a timely record of who is funding local political activity and how money is spent—especially close to Election Day, when late contributions and rapid expenditures can otherwise remain unseen until after ballots are cast.

Figure 2. Monmouth County Republican Committee recognizing Impreveduto victory, Source: Facebook post.
Figure 2. Monmouth County Republican Committee recognizing Impreveduto victory, Source: Facebook post.

Public Record NJ has previously examined how political spending and information channels can converge in Monmouth County, including the role that party committees and aligned political communication can play in shaping local narratives. In that broader transparency context, enforcement complaints—regardless of outcome—offer a public record of what regulators say is missing from disclosure systems and what they are seeking to test in an administrative proceeding.

This article is based on ELEC enforcement complaints and ELEC filings included in the records reviewed. Because the matters are at the complaint stage, the allegations described have not been finally adjudicated.

Notes

  1. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, “New Jersey Election Law Complaint and Notice of Enforcement Commission, Opportunity for a Hearing v. Rocco Impreveduto, Candidate, and Joe Romano, Treasurer,” (Feb. 18, 2026), p. 1.
  2. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, “New Jersey Election Law Complaint and Notice of Enforcement Commission, Opportunity for a Hearing v. Holmdel NJ Republican Committee, Municipal Political Party Committee, and Delia Fagan, Organizational Treasurer,” p. 1.
  3. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, “Complaint and Notice … v. Holmdel NJ Republican Committee … and Delia Fagan,” (Feb. 18, 2026), p. 5.
  4. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, “Complaint and Notice … v. Rocco Impreveduto … and Joe Romano,” (Feb. 18, 2026), p. 2.
  5. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, “Complaint and Notice … v. Rocco Impreveduto … and Joe Romano,” (Feb. 18, 2026), p. 3.
  6. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, “Complaint and Notice … v. Rocco Impreveduto … and Joe Romano,” (Feb. 18, 2026), p. 4.
  7. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, “Complaint and Notice … v. Rocco Impreveduto … and Joe Romano,” (Feb. 18, 2026), p. 5.
  8. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, “Complaint and Notice … v. Holmdel NJ Republican Committee … and Delia Fagan,” (Feb. 18, 2026), p. 2.
  9. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, “Complaint and Notice … v. Holmdel NJ Republican Committee … and Delia Fagan,” (Feb. 18, 2026), p. 3.
  10. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, “Complaint and Notice … v. Holmdel NJ Republican Committee … and Delia Fagan,”(Feb. 18, 2026), p. 4.
  11. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, Form A-1 sworn statement (Holmdel Township Committee), p. 1.
  12. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, party committee supplemental contributor reporting instructions (Form C-3 guidance), p. 1.
  13. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, Form R-3, “Holmdel NJ Republican Party,” 2025-Q2 (filed July 14, 2025), p. 1; Form R-3, 2025-Q3 (filed October 13, 2025), p. 1; Form R-3, 2025-Q4 (filed January 7, 2026), p. 1.
  14. New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, Form D-1, “Rocco Impreveduto for Holmdel Township Committee” (received Jan. 22, 2024), p. 1; New Jersey Election Law Enforcement Commission, Form R-1, “Rocco Impreveduto for Holmdel Township Committee,” 29-Day Pre Election (filed Oct. 30, 2024), p. 1.